WBS vs. WSFS
Compare and contrast key facts about Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) and WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
Performance
WBS vs. WSFS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WBS vs. WSFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBS Webster Financial Corporation | 10.90% | 17.31% | 12.48% | 11.48% | -12.51% | 36.63% | -16.87% | 11.54% | -10.38% | 5.51% |
WSFS WSFS Financial Corporation | 18.80% | 5.23% | 17.14% | 2.86% | -8.44% | 12.86% | 3.60% | 17.32% | -20.08% | 3.91% |
Fundamentals
WBS:
$11.15B
WSFS:
$3.56B
WBS:
$6.12
WSFS:
$5.12
WBS:
11.33
WSFS:
12.79
WBS:
1.12
WSFS:
19.74
WBS:
2.57
WSFS:
2.70
WBS:
1.21
WSFS:
1.30
WBS:
$4.42B
WSFS:
$1.36B
WBS:
$2.69B
WSFS:
$1.02B
WBS:
$1.31B
WSFS:
$407.76M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBS achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than WSFS's 18.80% return. Over the past 10 years, WBS has outperformed WSFS with an annualized return of 10.23%, while WSFS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.26% annualized return.
WBS
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 18.25%
- 1Y
- 38.45%
- 3Y*
- 24.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
WSFS
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 18.80%
- 6M
- 22.08%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBS vs. WSFS — Risk / Return Rank
WBS
WSFS
WBS vs. WSFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) and WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WBS | WSFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.98 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 1.46 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.88 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.34 | 4.29 | +2.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WBS | WSFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.98 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.20 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.23 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.21 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between WBS and WSFS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WBS vs. WSFS - Dividend Comparison
WBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than WSFS's 1.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBS Webster Financial Corporation | 2.30% | 2.54% | 2.90% | 3.15% | 3.38% | 2.87% | 3.80% | 2.87% | 2.54% | 1.83% | 1.81% | 2.39% |
WSFS WSFS Financial Corporation | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.24% | 1.02% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.11% | 0.63% | 0.54% | 0.65% |
Drawdowns
WBS vs. WSFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBS drawdown since its inception was -93.72%, which is greater than WSFS's maximum drawdown of -80.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBS and WSFS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBS | WSFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.72% | -80.77% | -12.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.90% | -14.91% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.90% | -45.54% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.99% | -65.50% | -6.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -7.11% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -24.80% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 6.52% | -0.23% |
Volatility
WBS vs. WSFS - Volatility Comparison
Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) at 5.38%. This indicates that WBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WBS | WSFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.62% | 5.38% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.21% | 19.15% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.35% | 28.52% | +6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 33.09% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.93% | 35.82% | +4.11% |
Financials
WBS vs. WSFS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Webster Financial Corporation and WSFS Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WBS vs. WSFS - Profitability Comparison
WBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Webster Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 704.20M and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.2%.
WSFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WSFS Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 259.21M and revenue of 341.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.9%.
WBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Webster Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 320.97M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.3%.
WSFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WSFS Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 97.23M and revenue of 341.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.
WBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Webster Financial Corporation reported a net income of 255.82M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 22.6%.
WSFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WSFS Financial Corporation reported a net income of 72.68M and revenue of 341.72M, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.