CFG vs. RF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).

Performance

CFG vs. RF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CFG vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc.	3.39%	38.60%	38.01%	-11.01%	-13.37%	37.02%	-6.73%	41.84%	-27.44%	19.91%
RF Regions Financial Corporation	-2.69%	21.99%	27.00%	-5.69%	2.33%	39.39%	-1.61%	33.35%	-20.59%	22.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CFG : $26.12B RF : $22.99B
EPS CFG : $4.20 RF : $2.42
PE Ratio CFG : 14.27 RF : 10.80
PS Ratio CFG : 2.34 RF : 2.42
PB Ratio CFG : 1.08 RF : 1.30
Total Revenue (TTM) CFG : $11.15B RF : $9.61B
Gross Profit (TTM) CFG : $7.78B RF : $7.17B
EBITDA (TTM) CFG : $2.69B RF : $2.81B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFG achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly higher than RF's -2.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CFG has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 15.08%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 17.02% annualized return.

CFG

• 1D: 4.39%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 6M: 14.63%
• 1Y: 51.73%
• 3Y*: 31.22%
• 5Y*: 10.47%
• 10Y*: 15.08%

RF

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 17.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CFG vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFG

CFG Risk / Return Rank: 84
CFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CFG Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CFG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

RF

RF Risk / Return Rank: 69
RF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFG vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFG	RF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	0.85	+0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	1.28	+0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.19	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	1.47	+1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.29	3.71	+4.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFG vs. RF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the RF Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFG and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFG	RF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	0.85	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.29	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.47	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.17	+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between CFG and RF is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CFG vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

CFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than RF's 4.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc.	2.93%	2.94%	3.84%	5.07%	4.11%	3.30%	4.36%	3.35%	3.30%	1.52%	1.29%	1.53%
RF Regions Financial Corporation	4.00%	5.12%	4.17%	4.54%	3.43%	2.98%	3.85%	3.44%	3.44%	1.82%	1.78%	2.40%

Drawdowns

CFG vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFG drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFG and RF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFG	RF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.60%	-92.65%	+27.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.32%	-18.45%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.19%	-40.99%	-15.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.60%	-60.73%	-4.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.96%	-14.79%	+2.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.12%	-31.19%	+13.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.57%	7.31%	-0.74%

Volatility

CFG vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 6.68%. This indicates that CFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFG	RF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.03%	6.68%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.85%	18.83%	+2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.80%	29.81%	+2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.14%	31.63%	+2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.28%	36.02%	+2.26%

Financials

CFG vs. RF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.16B and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.

CFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 677.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.4%.

RF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 708.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.

CFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 528.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.5%.

RF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.