CFG vs. RF
Compare and contrast key facts about Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CFG or RF.
Key characteristics
| CFG | RF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.92% | 5.91% |
| 1Y Return | 46.36% | 34.36% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -6.23% | -0.65% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.81% | 11.50% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.52 | 1.01 |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.62% | 31.83% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.60% | -92.65% |
| Current Drawdown | -27.00% | -12.32% |
Fundamentals
| CFG | RF | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $16.41B | $18.16B |
| EPS | $2.78 | $1.85 |
| PE Ratio | 12.97 | 10.72 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.26 | 9.99 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.37B | $6.80B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $7.55B | $6.94B |
Correlation
The correlation between CFG and RF is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CFG vs. RF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CFG achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than RF's 5.91% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CFG vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CFG vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
CFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than RF's 4.54% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 4.60% | 5.07% | 4.11% | 3.30% | 4.36% | 3.35% | 3.30% | 1.52% | 1.29% | 1.53% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.54% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
CFG vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFG drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFG and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CFG vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 4.20%. This indicates that CFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CFG vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities