PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CFG vs. RF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CFG and RF is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

CFG vs. RF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
167.77%
229.29%
CFG
RF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CFG:

1.30

RF:

1.17

Sortino Ratio

CFG:

2.02

RF:

1.81

Omega Ratio

CFG:

1.25

RF:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

CFG:

1.01

RF:

1.31

Martin Ratio

CFG:

7.84

RF:

5.65

Ulcer Index

CFG:

5.13%

RF:

5.52%

Daily Std Dev

CFG:

30.97%

RF:

26.55%

Max Drawdown

CFG:

-65.60%

RF:

-92.65%

Current Drawdown

CFG:

-11.41%

RF:

-12.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CFG:

$19.72B

RF:

$22.37B

EPS

CFG:

$2.55

RF:

$1.77

PE Ratio

CFG:

17.55

RF:

13.90

PEG Ratio

CFG:

0.26

RF:

4.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

CFG:

$10.22B

RF:

$7.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CFG:

$10.16B

RF:

$8.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

CFG:

$939.00M

RF:

$2.76B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFG achieves a 37.03% return, which is significantly higher than RF's 28.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CFG has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 9.26%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return.


CFG

YTD

37.03%

1M

-5.79%

6M

27.46%

1Y

37.99%

5Y*

6.23%

10Y*

9.26%

RF

YTD

28.38%

1M

-8.64%

6M

28.12%

1Y

29.99%

5Y*

11.09%

10Y*

12.11%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CFG vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CFG, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.301.17
The chart of Sortino ratio for CFG, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.021.81
The chart of Omega ratio for CFG, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.251.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for CFG, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.011.31
The chart of Martin ratio for CFG, currently valued at 7.84, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.007.845.65
CFG
RF

The current CFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the RF Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFG and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.30
1.17
CFG
RF

Dividends

CFG vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

CFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than RF's 4.12% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CFG
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
3.87%5.07%4.11%3.30%4.36%3.35%3.30%1.52%1.29%1.53%0.40%0.00%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
4.12%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%1.01%

Drawdowns

CFG vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFG drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFG and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-11.41%
-12.67%
CFG
RF

Volatility

CFG vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF) have volatilities of 7.55% and 7.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.55%
7.89%
CFG
RF

Financials

CFG vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab