Correlation
The correlation between WBS and RF is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
WBS vs. RF
Compare and contrast key facts about Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WBS or RF.
Performance
WBS vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
WBS:
0.50
RF:
0.58
WBS:
1.01
RF:
1.01
WBS:
1.14
RF:
1.14
WBS:
0.64
RF:
0.55
WBS:
1.70
RF:
1.39
WBS:
12.43%
RF:
12.55%
WBS:
43.86%
RF:
30.81%
WBS:
-93.72%
RF:
-92.65%
WBS:
-16.84%
RF:
-20.39%
Fundamentals
WBS:
$8.66B
RF:
$19.39B
WBS:
$4.44
RF:
$2.06
WBS:
11.59
RF:
10.41
WBS:
1.93
RF:
2.77
WBS:
3.65
RF:
2.91
WBS:
0.98
RF:
1.15
WBS:
$2.92B
RF:
$9.40B
WBS:
$1.80B
RF:
$6.66B
WBS:
$801.30M
RF:
$2.63B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBS achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly higher than RF's -7.87% return. Over the past 10 years, WBS has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 6.27%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.
WBS
-5.40%
8.55%
-15.44%
20.03%
5.15%
16.76%
6.27%
RF
-7.87%
4.53%
-19.78%
15.69%
3.42%
18.38%
11.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WBS vs. RF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WBS
RF
WBS vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
WBS vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
WBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than RF's 4.62% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBS Webster Financial Corporation | 3.11% | 2.90% | 3.15% | 3.38% | 2.87% | 3.80% | 2.87% | 2.54% | 1.83% | 1.81% | 2.39% | 2.31% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.62% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
WBS vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBS drawdown since its inception was -93.72%, roughly equal to the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBS and RF.
Loading data...
Volatility
WBS vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) has a higher volatility of 10.22% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 8.64%. This indicates that WBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
WBS vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Webster Financial Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities