PortfoliosLab logo
CFG vs. USB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CFG and USB is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CFG vs. USB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and U.S. Bancorp (USB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CFG:

0.47

USB:

0.45

Sortino Ratio

CFG:

0.93

USB:

0.71

Omega Ratio

CFG:

1.13

USB:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

CFG:

0.54

USB:

0.34

Martin Ratio

CFG:

1.70

USB:

0.96

Ulcer Index

CFG:

10.26%

USB:

11.58%

Daily Std Dev

CFG:

35.54%

USB:

29.75%

Max Drawdown

CFG:

-65.60%

USB:

-76.08%

Current Drawdown

CFG:

-13.52%

USB:

-17.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CFG:

$18.14B

USB:

$69.99B

EPS

CFG:

$3.15

USB:

$4.04

PE Ratio

CFG:

13.28

USB:

11.12

PEG Ratio

CFG:

0.26

USB:

1.66

PS Ratio

CFG:

2.55

USB:

2.76

PB Ratio

CFG:

0.80

USB:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

CFG:

$8.73B

USB:

$42.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CFG:

$8.81B

USB:

$25.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

CFG:

$3.27B

USB:

$9.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFG achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly higher than USB's -5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CFG has outperformed USB with an annualized return of 8.27%, while USB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.83% annualized return.


CFG

YTD

-3.06%

1M

18.62%

6M

-8.91%

1Y

16.43%

3Y*

8.25%

5Y*

19.16%

10Y*

8.27%

USB

YTD

-5.23%

1M

17.25%

6M

-9.50%

1Y

13.18%

3Y*

1.68%

5Y*

10.94%

10Y*

3.83%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Citizens Financial Group, Inc.

U.S. Bancorp

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CFG vs. USB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CFG is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CFG is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CFG is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CFG is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CFG is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CFG is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

USB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of USB is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of USB is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of USB is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of USB is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of USB is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of USB is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CFG vs. USB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and U.S. Bancorp (USB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the USB Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFG and USB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CFG vs. USB - Dividend Comparison

CFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than USB's 4.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CFG
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
4.04%3.84%5.07%4.11%3.30%4.36%3.35%3.30%1.52%1.29%1.53%0.40%
USB
U.S. Bancorp
4.44%4.14%4.46%4.31%3.13%3.61%2.66%2.93%2.16%2.08%2.37%2.15%

Drawdowns

CFG vs. USB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFG drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, smaller than the maximum USB drawdown of -76.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFG and USB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CFG vs. USB - Volatility Comparison

Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 6.38%. This indicates that CFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CFG vs. USB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
2.90B
10.35B
(CFG) Total Revenue
(USB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CFG vs. USB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
66.8%
61.7%
(CFG) Gross Margin
(USB) Gross Margin
CFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.94B and revenue of 2.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.

USB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, U.S. Bancorp reported a gross profit of 6.39B and revenue of 10.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.

CFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 621.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.

USB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, U.S. Bancorp reported an operating income of 2.16B and revenue of 10.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

CFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 373.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

USB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, U.S. Bancorp reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 10.35B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.