PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CFG vs. WAL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CFGWAL
YTD Return46.90%41.99%
1Y Return78.20%91.54%
3Y Return (Ann)2.33%-5.87%
5Y Return (Ann)9.14%14.62%
10Y Return (Ann)10.66%14.71%
Sharpe Ratio2.542.12
Sortino Ratio3.522.89
Omega Ratio1.441.36
Calmar Ratio1.711.56
Martin Ratio17.069.26
Ulcer Index4.88%9.89%
Daily Std Dev32.77%43.13%
Max Drawdown-65.60%-92.14%
Current Drawdown-5.03%-19.75%

Fundamentals


CFGWAL
Market Cap$20.48B$10.24B
EPS$2.55$6.47
PE Ratio18.2314.37
PEG Ratio0.261.84
Total Revenue (TTM)$11.37B$4.83B
Gross Profit (TTM)$11.31B$4.77B
EBITDA (TTM)$688.00M$178.40M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CFG and WAL is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CFG vs. WAL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CFG achieves a 46.90% return, which is significantly higher than WAL's 41.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CFG has underperformed WAL with an annualized return of 10.66%, while WAL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.71% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
27.85%
42.09%
CFG
WAL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CFG vs. WAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CFG, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CFG, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CFG, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.42
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CFG, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CFG, currently valued at 16.02, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.02
WAL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WAL, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WAL, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WAL, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WAL, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.56
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WAL, currently valued at 9.26, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.26

CFG vs. WAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the WAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFG and WAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.39
2.12
CFG
WAL

Dividends

CFG vs. WAL - Dividend Comparison

CFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than WAL's 2.02% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CFG
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
3.61%5.07%4.11%3.30%4.36%3.35%3.30%1.52%1.29%1.53%0.40%
WAL
Western Alliance Bancorporation
1.62%2.20%2.38%1.11%1.67%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CFG vs. WAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFG drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, smaller than the maximum WAL drawdown of -92.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFG and WAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.03%
-19.75%
CFG
WAL

Volatility

CFG vs. WAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) is 15.73%, while Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) has a volatility of 19.80%. This indicates that CFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.73%
19.80%
CFG
WAL

Financials

CFG vs. WAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and Western Alliance Bancorporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items