WBS vs. XLF

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

WBS (Webster Financial Corporation) is a stock, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, WBS returned 11.40%/yr vs 13.69%/yr for XLF. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.

Performance

WBS vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBS achieves a 24.04% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, WBS has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 11.40%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return.

WBS

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.65%
• 6M: 18.71%
• YTD: 24.04%
• 1Y: 41.38%
• 3Y*: 22.31%
• 5Y*: 13.48%
• 10Y*: 11.40%
• ALL TIME*: 9.51%

XLF

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.37%
• 6M: 7.47%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 1Y: 12.50%
• 3Y*: 19.11%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: 13.69%
• ALL TIME*: 6.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
WBS Webster Financial Corporation	$314.34M	$303.34M	$266.04M
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	$1.84B	$1.93B	$1.92B

WBS vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WBS Webster Financial Corporation	24.04%	17.31%	12.48%	11.48%	-12.51%	36.63%	-16.87%	11.54%	-10.38%	5.51%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	4.86%	14.90%	30.56%	12.03%	-10.59%	34.80%	-1.74%	31.88%	-13.06%	22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between WBS and XLF is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998	0.70

The correlation between WBS and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WBS vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WBS

WBS Risk / Return Rank: 85
WBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
WBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
WBS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
WBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
WBS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

XLF

XLF Risk / Return Rank: 27
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 28
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WBS vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WBS	XLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	0.71	+0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	1.05	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.13	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	0.71	+1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.10	1.80	+6.30

WBS vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBS and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WBS vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBS drawdown since its inception was -93.72%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBS and XLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WBS	XLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.72%	-82.69%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.02%	-14.79%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.08%	-15.54%	-17.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.90%	-25.81%	-22.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.99%	-42.86%	-29.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-1.15%	+0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.59%	-19.92%	-3.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.64%	5.79%	-1.15%

Volatility

WBS vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.07%. This indicates that WBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WBS	XLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.73%	4.07%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.07%	11.10%	+2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.11%	14.77%	+9.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.76%	18.45%	+17.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.59%	22.08%	+17.51%

Dividends

WBS vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

WBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than XLF's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WBS Webster Financial Corporation	2.07%	2.54%	2.90%	3.15%	3.38%	2.87%	3.80%	2.87%	2.54%	1.83%	1.81%	2.39%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.42%	1.31%	1.42%	1.71%	2.04%	1.63%	2.03%	1.87%	2.08%	1.48%	21.10%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WBS and XLF in my portfolio?

WBS and XLF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WBS or XLF?

WBS has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to XLF (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBS dropped -93.72% vs XLF's -82.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.