WARP vs. QTUM
WARP (VanEck Space ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WARP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Space Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WARP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
WARP vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WARP
- 1D
- -6.84%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
WARP vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 23.47% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 18.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between WARP and QTUM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WARP vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
WARP
QTUM
WARP vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WARP | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 22.26 | 1.08 | +21.19 |
Drawdowns
WARP vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WARP | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -38.45% | +19.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.67% | -0.59% | -18.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -8.25% | +5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.04% | — |
Volatility
WARP vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WARP | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.83% | 26.26% | +57.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 26.56% | +57.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.83% | 27.17% | +56.66% |
WARP vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
WARP vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WARP and QTUM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WARP.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.
WARP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.40% for QTUM.
Find the right allocation for WARP and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer