PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WARP vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WARP vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WARP

1D
-6.84%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTUM

1D
-0.59%
1M
23.63%
YTD
53.29%
6M
50.69%
1Y
95.36%
3Y*
52.22%
5Y*
29.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WARP vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
WARP
VanEck Space ETF
23.47%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
18.87%

Correlation

The correlation between WARP and QTUM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2026

0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WARP vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WARP

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WARP vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space ETF (WARP) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WARP vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WARPQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

22.26

1.08

+21.19

Drawdowns

WARP vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WARP drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WARP and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WARPQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.67%

-38.45%

+19.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.67%

-0.59%

-18.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-8.25%

+5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

Volatility

WARP vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WARPQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.83%

26.26%

+57.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.83%

26.56%

+57.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.83%

27.17%

+56.66%

WARP vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WARP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

WARP vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

WARP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.70%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%
WARP
VanEck Space ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WARP and QTUM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WARP.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.00% for WARP.

WARP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. WARP tracks MarketVector Space Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WARP and 0.40% for QTUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WARP and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer