QTUM vs. FTEC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - QTUM tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index while FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 29.66%/yr vs 23.33%/yr for FTEC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.

Performance

QTUM vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 54.21% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's 33.89% return.

QTUM

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: 24.85%
• YTD: 54.21%
• 6M: 54.71%
• 1Y: 98.68%
• 3Y*: 52.52%
• 5Y*: 29.66%
• 10Y*: —

FTEC

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: 20.11%
• YTD: 33.89%
• 6M: 32.97%
• 1Y: 65.82%
• 3Y*: 34.61%
• 5Y*: 23.33%
• 10Y*: 25.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	54.21%	36.65%	50.54%	39.86%	-28.80%	35.18%	42.05%	47.99%	-19.02%
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	33.89%	22.11%	29.40%	53.30%	-29.59%	30.49%	45.83%	48.93%	-16.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and FTEC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018	0.87

The correlation between QTUM and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTUM vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTUM	FTEC
Technology	84.2%	98.0%
Industrials	9.0%	0.6%
Communication Services	5.3%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	0.0%
Healthcare	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.4%
Financial Services	-	0.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QTUM vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 92
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FTEC

FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 82
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTUM	FTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.78	3.22	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.36	3.90	+0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.52	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.65	4.14	+2.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	25.13	13.34	+11.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTUM vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 3.78, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTUM	FTEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.78	3.22	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.12	0.93	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.99	+0.09

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and FTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTUM	FTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.45%	-34.95%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.26%	-16.26%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.39%	-27.30%	+1.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.45%	-34.95%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.26%	-5.56%	-2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	5.05%	-1.01%

Volatility

QTUM vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 6.02%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTUM	FTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.64%	6.02%	+3.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.35%	16.05%	+4.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.27%	20.57%	+5.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.56%	25.22%	+1.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.17%	24.69%	+2.48%

QTUM vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTUM vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than FTEC's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	0.32%	0.43%	0.49%	0.77%	0.93%	0.63%	0.83%	1.03%	1.20%	0.96%	1.25%	1.27%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.70%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTUM and FTEC in my portfolio?

QTUM and FTEC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTUM or FTEC?

QTUM has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to FTEC (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

Which ETF is better, QTUM or FTEC?

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.66% vs 23.33% for FTEC. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTUM or FTEC?

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.66% return vs 23.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTUM or FTEC?

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTUM or FTEC?

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.

What is the main difference between QTUM and FTEC?

QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.08% for FTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 3.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.