PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NASA vs. ARKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NASA vs. ARKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NASA

1D
-9.48%
1M
1.71%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARKX

1D
-6.38%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
17.46%
6M
19.82%
1Y
56.58%
3Y*
33.13%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASA vs. ARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NASA and ARKX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NASA vs. ARKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NASA

ARKX
ARKX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ARKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASA vs. ARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NASA vs. ARKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NASAARKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.20

0.38

+4.81

Drawdowns

NASA vs. ARKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -22.08%, smaller than the maximum ARKX drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and ARKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NASAARKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.08%

-43.61%

+21.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.08%

-9.80%

-12.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-19.97%

+16.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.60%

Volatility

NASA vs. ARKX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NASAARKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.27%

33.16%

+28.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.27%

27.86%

+33.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.27%

27.55%

+33.72%

NASA vs. ARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NASA and ARKX have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

NASA vs. ARKX - Dividend Comparison

Neither NASA nor ARKX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NASA and ARKX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NASA and ARKX have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

NASA and ARKX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tema and ARK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASA and ARKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer