NASA vs. ARKX
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
NASA vs. ARKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -27.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKX
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -12.20%
- 6M
- -13.85%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 1Y
- 10.42%
- 3Y*
- 24.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
NASA vs. ARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | -4.61% |
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and ARKX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. ARKX — Risk / Return Rank
NASA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARKX
NASA vs. ARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NASA | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NASA vs. ARKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -45.12%, roughly equal to the maximum ARKX drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and ARKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.12% | -43.61% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.12% | -19.71% | -25.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.01% | -19.80% | +5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.74% | — |
Volatility
NASA vs. ARKX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | ARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.63% | 34.13% | +32.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.63% | 28.33% | +38.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.63% | 27.76% | +38.87% |
NASA vs. ARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NASA and ARKX have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
NASA vs. ARKX - Dividend Comparison
Neither NASA nor ARKX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NASA and ARKX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NASA and ARKX have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
NASA and ARKX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and ARK.
Find the right allocation for NASA and ARKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer