NASA vs. ORBX
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and ORBX (Global X Space Tech ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. NASA is actively managed, while ORBX is passively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. NASA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ORBX.
Performance
NASA vs. ORBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -25.91%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ORBX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -25.65%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.19M | $44.00M | $218.58M | |
| $1.11M | $1.59M | $5.52M |
NASA vs. ORBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | -25.06% |
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | -23.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and ORBX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. ORBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NASA vs. ORBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -50.97%, roughly equal to the maximum ORBX drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and ORBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.97% | -51.53% | +0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.39% | -49.40% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.87% | -22.31% | +4.44% |
Volatility
NASA vs. ORBX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | ORBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.62% | 75.43% | -9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.62% | 75.43% | -9.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.62% | 75.43% | -9.81% |
NASA vs. ORBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ORBX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASA vs. ORBX - Dividend Comparison
Neither NASA nor ORBX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, NASA and ORBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ORBX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ORBX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.
NASA and ORBX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.50% for ORBX.
Find the right allocation for NASA and ORBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer