VYM vs. SMH
VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VYM returned 11.95%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VYM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
VYM vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 11.95%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
VYM
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 25.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 11.44%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
VYM vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.37% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VYM and SMH is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VYM and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VYM vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VYM
SMH
Financial Services
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VYM
SMH
-
Technology
VYM
SMH
Healthcare
VYM
SMH
-
Industrials
VYM
SMH
-
Energy
VYM
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
VYM
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VYM
SMH
-
Utilities
VYM
SMH
-
Communication Services
VYM
SMH
-
Basic Materials
VYM
SMH
-
Real Estate
VYM
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VYM vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
VYM
SMH
VYM vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VYM | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.60 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 9.18 | -5.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 33.74 | -19.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VYM vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VYM | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -84.96% | +27.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -14.93% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -35.74% | +21.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -45.30% | +29.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -45.30% | +10.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -2.81% | +2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -41.04% | +33.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 4.06% | -2.26% |
Volatility
VYM vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 3.31%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VYM | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 16.25% | -12.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 27.73% | -19.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 33.20% | -22.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 35.47% | -21.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 32.82% | -16.47% |
VYM vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VYM vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VYM and SMH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to VYM (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 11.95% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
VYM is categorized as Dividend, while SMH is Semiconductors. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VYM and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer