VYM vs. SLVP
VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VYM returned 11.95%/yr vs 12.67%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VYM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
VYM vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's -5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has underperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 11.95%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.67% annualized return.
VYM
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
SLVP
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -21.72%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 83.53%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
VYM vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.37% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -5.37% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between VYM and SLVP is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.23 |
The correlation between VYM and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VYM vs. SLVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VYM
SLVP
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VYM
SLVP
-
Technology
VYM
SLVP
-
Healthcare
VYM
SLVP
-
Industrials
VYM
SLVP
-
Energy
VYM
SLVP
-
Consumer Defensive
VYM
SLVP
-
Consumer Cyclical
VYM
SLVP
-
Utilities
VYM
SLVP
-
Communication Services
VYM
SLVP
-
Basic Materials
VYM
SLVP
Real Estate
VYM
SLVP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VYM vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
VYM
SLVP
VYM vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VYM | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.21 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 5.86 | +7.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VYM vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VYM | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -80.47% | +23.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -38.06% | +31.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -38.06% | +23.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -54.26% | +38.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -62.03% | +26.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -31.74% | +31.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -46.78% | +39.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 14.31% | -12.51% |
Volatility
VYM vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 3.31%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 19.61%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VYM | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 19.61% | -16.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 45.17% | -37.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 54.53% | -44.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 43.15% | -29.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 42.45% | -26.10% |
VYM vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VYM vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than SLVP's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.88% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VYM and SLVP have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to VYM (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
On 10-year performance, SLVP leads with 12.67% vs 11.95% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLVP has performed better with a 12.67% return vs 11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.88% for SLVP.
VYM is categorized as Dividend, while SLVP is Silver. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.39% for SLVP.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VYM and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer