SLVP vs. SIVR

In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a 35.01% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's 15.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLVP having a 7.11% annualized return and SIVR not far behind at 6.80%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SLVP Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVP and SIVR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, which is greater than SIVR's maximum drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and SIVR.

iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 14.24% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) at 6.55%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.