SLVP vs. SSLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L).
SLVP and SSLN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLVP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. SSLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both SLVP and SSLN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLVP or SSLN.L.
Performance
SLVP vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLVP having a 29.91% return and SSLN.L slightly higher at 30.85%. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has underperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 5.35%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.66% annualized return.
SLVP
29.91%
-15.24%
5.29%
42.25%
7.44%
5.35%
SSLN.L
30.85%
-8.38%
2.52%
28.85%
12.74%
8.66%
Key characteristics
| SLVP | SSLN.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.06 | 1.04 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.66 | 1.58 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.63 | 0.66 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.78 | 3.53 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.69% | 8.21% |
| Daily Std Dev | 38.28% | 27.73% |
| Max Drawdown | -80.47% | -69.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -40.08% | -21.29% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLVP vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and SSLN.L is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLVP vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLVP vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF | 0.67% | 0.87% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 2.39% | 2.02% | 1.27% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.71% | 2.03% | 1.72% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, which is greater than SSLN.L's maximum drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and SSLN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLVP vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) at 7.98%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.