VYM vs. PRFRX
VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and PRFRX (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund) are both funds - VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while PRFRX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, VYM returned 11.95%/yr vs 5.46%/yr for PRFRX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VYM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PRFRX.
Performance
VYM vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than PRFRX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has outperformed PRFRX with an annualized return of 11.95%, while PRFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.46% annualized return.
VYM
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 25.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
PRFRX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 7.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
VYM vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.37% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund | 0.83% | 9.82% | 11.04% | 13.78% | -1.95% | 4.60% | 1.75% | 8.46% | -0.08% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VYM and PRFRX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2011 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VYM vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank
VYM
PRFRX
VYM vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VYM | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 2.14 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 5.15 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 19.34 | -5.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VYM vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than PRFRX's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and PRFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VYM | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -20.05% | -36.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -1.50% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -2.35% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -5.94% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -20.05% | -15.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.55% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -0.69% | -6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 0.40% | +1.40% |
Volatility
VYM vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) at 0.64%. This indicates that VYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VYM | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 0.64% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 1.86% | +5.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 2.65% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 2.91% | +11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 3.92% | +12.43% |
VYM vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFRX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
VYM vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison
VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than PRFRX's 9.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund | 9.26% | 9.99% | 10.20% | 9.57% | 4.03% | 3.86% | 4.00% | 4.84% | 4.87% | 4.04% | 4.07% | 4.07% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VYM and PRFRX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VYM has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to PRFRX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs PRFRX's -20.05%.
PRFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VYM and PRFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer