PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFRX vs. FFRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFRX vs. FFRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class (PRFRX) and Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRFRX having a 1.84% return and FFRAX slightly higher at 1.88%. Over the past 10 years, PRFRX has outperformed FFRAX with an annualized return of 6.39%, while FFRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.44% annualized return.


PRFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.93%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
6.39%
ALL TIME*
5.49%

FFRAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.11%
6M
1.77%
YTD
1.88%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
4.44%
ALL TIME*
3.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRFRX vs. FFRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class
1.84%7.78%16.63%20.66%-1.95%4.60%1.75%8.46%-0.08%3.48%
FFRAX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A
1.88%5.28%6.83%11.35%-1.77%4.83%1.38%8.19%-0.09%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFRX and FFRAX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2011

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between PRFRX and FFRAX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFRX vs. FFRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRFRX
PRFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PRFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRAX
FFRAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FFRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRFRX vs. FFRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class (PRFRX) and Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFRXFFRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.70

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

4.18

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

13.94

-3.04

PRFRX vs. FFRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FFRAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFRX and FFRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFRX vs. FFRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFRX drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum FFRAX drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFRX and FFRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFRXFFRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.05%

-22.21%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.50%

-1.21%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.07%

-3.31%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.94%

-6.02%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.05%

-22.21%

+2.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.11%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-1.02%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.36%

+0.06%

Volatility

PRFRX vs. FFRAX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class (PRFRX) has a higher volatility of 0.30% compared to Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) at 0.27%. This indicates that PRFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFRXFFRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

0.27%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.78%

1.76%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44%

2.38%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.15%

2.89%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.00%

4.13%

-0.13%

PRFRX vs. FFRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFRX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRAX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFRX vs. FFRAX - Dividend Comparison

PRFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than FFRAX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRAX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A
6.13%7.12%6.69%7.24%3.57%2.47%3.56%4.86%4.42%3.77%4.14%3.42%
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class
6.76%8.11%15.09%15.33%4.03%3.86%4.00%4.84%4.87%4.04%4.07%4.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFRX and FFRAX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFRX has higher volatility (0.30%) compared to FFRAX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFRX dropped -20.05% vs FFRAX's -22.21%.

FFRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFRX and FFRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer