PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PRFRX vs. FLRN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PRFRX vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.46%
2.88%
PRFRX
FLRN

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFRX achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than FLRN's 5.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFRX has outperformed FLRN with an annualized return of 4.50%, while FLRN has yielded a comparatively lower 2.38% annualized return.


PRFRX

YTD

7.56%

1M

0.98%

6M

4.46%

1Y

10.23%

5Y (annualized)

5.34%

10Y (annualized)

4.50%

FLRN

YTD

5.72%

1M

0.43%

6M

2.87%

1Y

6.54%

5Y (annualized)

2.99%

10Y (annualized)

2.38%

Key characteristics


PRFRXFLRN
Sharpe Ratio3.897.74
Sortino Ratio12.6014.58
Omega Ratio4.254.41
Calmar Ratio13.5914.49
Martin Ratio72.02181.00
Ulcer Index0.14%0.04%
Daily Std Dev2.63%0.85%
Max Drawdown-20.05%-14.64%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRFRX vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFRX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio.


PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
Expense ratio chart for PRFRX: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for FLRN: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between PRFRX and FLRN is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRFRX vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PRFRX, currently valued at 3.89, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.003.897.74
The chart of Sortino ratio for PRFRX, currently valued at 12.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0012.6014.58
The chart of Omega ratio for PRFRX, currently valued at 4.25, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.004.254.41
The chart of Calmar ratio for PRFRX, currently valued at 13.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0013.5914.49
The chart of Martin ratio for PRFRX, currently valued at 72.02, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0072.02181.00
PRFRX
FLRN

The current PRFRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is lower than the FLRN Sharpe Ratio of 7.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFRX and FLRN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio3.004.005.006.007.008.009.0010.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.89
7.74
PRFRX
FLRN

Dividends

PRFRX vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

PRFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.38%, more than FLRN's 5.86% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
8.38%8.33%5.20%3.87%4.00%4.84%4.86%4.04%4.08%4.08%3.85%3.53%
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
5.86%5.68%1.95%0.40%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.63%1.06%0.63%0.53%0.72%

Drawdowns

PRFRX vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFRX drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, which is greater than FLRN's maximum drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFRX and FLRN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
PRFRX
FLRN

Volatility

PRFRX vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.22%. This indicates that PRFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.68%
0.22%
PRFRX
FLRN