PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 19.95% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 11.86%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.60% annualized return.


VYM

1D
1.54%
1M
3.65%
6M
10.11%
YTD
16.57%
1Y
25.99%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
11.86%
ALL TIME*
9.48%

HDV

1D
0.24%
1M
2.71%
6M
8.59%
YTD
19.95%
1Y
24.72%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
9.60%
ALL TIME*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$176.49M$158.01M$110.76M
$218.18M$204.80M$205.80M

VYM vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
16.57%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
19.95%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and HDV is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between VYM and HDV has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VYM vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYM
HDV

Financial Services

21.0%
4.7%

Technology

17.8%
0.9%

Healthcare

13.2%
23.9%

Industrials

12.6%
2.8%

Energy

8.6%
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
9.3%

Utilities

5.7%
8.2%

Basic Materials

3.3%
0.8%

Communication Services

3.0%
5.2%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Financial Services

VYM
21.0%
HDV
4.7%

Technology

VYM
17.8%
HDV
0.9%

Healthcare

VYM
13.2%
HDV
23.9%

Industrials

VYM
12.6%
HDV
2.8%

Energy

VYM
8.6%
HDV
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

VYM
8.1%
HDV
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VYM
6.8%
HDV
9.3%

Utilities

VYM
5.7%
HDV
8.2%

Basic Materials

VYM
3.3%
HDV
0.8%

Communication Services

VYM
3.0%
HDV
5.2%

Real Estate

VYM
0.0%
HDV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VYM vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VYMHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.40

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

4.80

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.66

13.10

+1.56

VYM vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VYM vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-37.04%

-19.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-5.18%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-10.49%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-15.42%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-37.04%

+1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.48%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-3.06%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.89%

-0.11%

Volatility

VYM vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 2.79%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

4.30%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

8.66%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

10.81%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

12.94%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

15.79%

+0.52%

VYM vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VYM vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than HDV's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
3.07%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.20%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYM and HDV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDV has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to VYM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.86% vs 9.60% for HDV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for HDV.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.20% for VYM.

VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.08% for HDV.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer