PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDV vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HDV having a 12.28% return and VOO slightly lower at 11.69%. Over the past 10 years, HDV has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.22%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


HDV

1D
0.85%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
12.28%
6M
12.66%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
9.22%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
12.28%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HDV and VOO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between HDV and VOO has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HDV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDV
VOO

Consumer Defensive

24.1%
4.9%

Energy

22.3%
3.5%

Healthcare

16.5%
8.5%

Financial Services

11.1%
11.6%

Utilities

9.2%
2.4%

Technology

8.2%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
10.2%

Industrials

1.4%
8.3%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.8%

Communication Services

0.1%
11.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

HDV
24.1%
VOO
4.9%

Energy

HDV
22.3%
VOO
3.5%

Healthcare

HDV
16.5%
VOO
8.5%

Financial Services

HDV
11.1%
VOO
11.6%

Utilities

HDV
9.2%
VOO
2.4%

Technology

HDV
8.2%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HDV
6.1%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

HDV
1.4%
VOO
8.3%

Basic Materials

HDV
1.2%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

HDV
0.1%
VOO
11.3%

Real Estate

HDV

-

VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDVVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

2.53

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

3.43

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

3.42

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.09

15.95

-4.85

HDV vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDV and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDVVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.53

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.85

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.87

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.89

-0.17

Drawdowns

HDV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDVVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-33.99%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-8.90%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

-18.69%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

-24.52%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-33.99%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

0.00%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-3.69%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.91%

-0.06%

Volatility

HDV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that HDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDVVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.74%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

8.88%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

11.78%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.82%

16.81%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

18.01%

-2.28%

HDV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.92%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDV and VOO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDV has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 9.22% for HDV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for HDV.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

HDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDV and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer