VYM vs. DFIV
VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. VYM is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VYM returned 18.37%/yr vs 23.03%/yr for DFIV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VYM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.
Performance
VYM vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 9.75% return.
VYM
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
DFIV
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 32.62%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VYM vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 10.90% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 7.25% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 9.75% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between VYM and DFIV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between VYM and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
VYM vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VYM
DFIV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VYM
DFIV
Technology
VYM
DFIV
Healthcare
VYM
DFIV
Industrials
VYM
DFIV
Energy
VYM
DFIV
Consumer Defensive
VYM
DFIV
Consumer Cyclical
VYM
DFIV
Utilities
VYM
DFIV
Communication Services
VYM
DFIV
Basic Materials
VYM
DFIV
Real Estate
VYM
DFIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VYM vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank
VYM
DFIV
VYM vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VYM | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.42 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 3.39 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.19 | 13.09 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VYM | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.36 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.91 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
VYM vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and DFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VYM | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -25.42% | -31.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -9.66% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -14.72% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -2.60% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -4.48% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 2.50% | -0.72% |
Volatility
VYM vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is 3.08%, while Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that VYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VYM | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 4.14% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 11.26% | -3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 13.88% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 16.66% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 16.66% | -0.32% |
VYM vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VYM vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison
VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than DFIV's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.60% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.22% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VYM and DFIV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFIV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to VYM (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs DFIV's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.03% vs 18.37% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.22% for VYM.
VYM is categorized as Dividend, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.27% for DFIV.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VYM and DFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer