DFIV vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
DFIV and FNDF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFIV is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Apr 16, 1999. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DFIV or FNDF.
Key characteristics
| DFIV | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.87% | 3.42% |
| 1Y Return | 14.30% | 10.04% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.33% | 4.25% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.34 | 0.99 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.84 | 1.41 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.18 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.33 | 1.54 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.54 | 5.24 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.28% | 2.45% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.86% | 12.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.42% | -40.14% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.12% | -8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIV and FNDF is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DFIV vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than FNDF's 3.42% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFIV vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DFIV vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DFIV vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than FNDF's 3.15% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 3.78% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.15% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.83% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
DFIV vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and FNDF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DFIV vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) is 3.79%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that DFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.