VXF vs. SCHM
VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) and SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - VXF tracks the S&P Completion Index while SCHM tracks the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VXF returned 12.33%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for SCHM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VXF charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHM.
Performance
VXF vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXF achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly lower than SCHM's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, VXF has outperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 12.33%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.54% annualized return.
VXF
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 30.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
SCHM
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 6M
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
VXF vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 15.65% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 20.31% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXF and SCHM is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.97 |
The correlation between VXF and SCHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VXF vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXF
SCHM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
VXF
SCHM
Industrials
VXF
SCHM
Financial Services
VXF
SCHM
Healthcare
VXF
SCHM
Consumer Cyclical
VXF
SCHM
Real Estate
VXF
SCHM
Energy
VXF
SCHM
Basic Materials
VXF
SCHM
Communication Services
VXF
SCHM
Consumer Defensive
VXF
SCHM
Utilities
VXF
SCHM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXF vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank
VXF
SCHM
VXF vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXF | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.66 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 14.61 | -4.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXF vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXF drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXF and SCHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXF | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.03% | -42.43% | -15.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -9.32% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.92% | -23.27% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -26.46% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.72% | -42.43% | +0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.63% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.54% | -5.64% | -3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.33% | +0.57% |
Volatility
VXF vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) at 5.67%. This indicates that VXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXF | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 5.67% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 12.47% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.81% | 16.19% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 19.66% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 20.51% | +1.83% |
VXF vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXF has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VXF vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison
VXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than SCHM's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VXF and SCHM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXF has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to SCHM (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXF dropped -58.03% vs SCHM's -42.43%.
On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.33% vs 11.54% for SCHM. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VXF.
SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.00% for VXF.
VXF tracks S&P Completion Index, while SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXF and 0.04% for SCHM.
SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXF and SCHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer