VXF vs. VTI
VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Completion Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VXF returned 12.23%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VXF charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
VXF vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXF achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, VXF has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 12.23%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.93% annualized return.
VXF
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 27.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
VTI
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 24.47%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- 14.93%
VXF vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 13.87% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.00% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXF and VTI is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2002 | 0.91 |
The correlation between VXF and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
VXF vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXF
VTI
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
VXF
VTI
Industrials
VXF
VTI
Financial Services
VXF
VTI
Healthcare
VXF
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
VXF
VTI
Real Estate
VXF
VTI
Energy
VXF
VTI
Basic Materials
VXF
VTI
Communication Services
VXF
VTI
Consumer Defensive
VXF
VTI
Utilities
VXF
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXF vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
VXF
VTI
VXF vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.76 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | 12.38 | -2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXF vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXF drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXF and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.03% | -55.45% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -8.92% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.92% | -19.30% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -25.36% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.72% | -35.00% | -6.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -2.69% | +1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -8.02% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.98% | +0.92% |
Volatility
VXF vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.49%. This indicates that VXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXF | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 4.49% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 9.83% | +3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 12.63% | +5.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 17.47% | +4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 18.33% | +4.00% |
VXF vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXF has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VXF vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
VXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, which matches VTI's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VXF and VTI have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXF has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to VTI (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXF dropped -58.03% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.93% vs 12.23% for VXF. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 12.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VXF.
VXF and VTI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.02%.
VXF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. VXF tracks S&P Completion Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXF and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXF and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer