PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXF vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXF vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXF achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 6.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VXF having a 11.74% annualized return and VOT not far behind at 11.66%.


VXF

1D
-0.30%
1M
-2.91%
6M
10.93%
YTD
13.55%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
11.74%
ALL TIME*
9.98%

VOT

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.91%
6M
7.03%
YTD
6.22%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
11.66%
ALL TIME*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$53.27M$59.32M$61.74M
$71.64M$76.55M$103.41M

VXF vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
13.55%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
6.22%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VXF and VOT is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006

0.94

The correlation between VXF and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VXF vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VXF
VOT

Industrials

19.6%
26.7%

Technology

19.2%
33.8%

Financial Services

13.7%
6.0%

Healthcare

13.6%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
10.8%

Real Estate

5.6%
4.2%

Basic Materials

4.7%
1.6%

Energy

4.3%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
0.7%

Utilities

1.8%
2.9%

Industrials

VXF
19.6%
VOT
26.7%

Technology

VXF
19.2%
VOT
33.8%

Financial Services

VXF
13.7%
VOT
6.0%

Healthcare

VXF
13.6%
VOT
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VXF
8.5%
VOT
10.8%

Real Estate

VXF
5.6%
VOT
4.2%

Basic Materials

VXF
4.7%
VOT
1.6%

Energy

VXF
4.3%
VOT
1.8%

Communication Services

VXF
2.8%
VOT
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

VXF
2.6%
VOT
0.7%

Utilities

VXF
1.8%
VOT
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXF vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VXF vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VXFVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.03

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

0.14

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

0.40

+6.54

VXF vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXF and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VXF vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXF drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXF and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXFVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-60.16%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-15.96%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.92%

-21.77%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-37.19%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.72%

-37.19%

-4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-3.52%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-9.90%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

5.42%

-2.41%

Volatility

VXF vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) is 3.91%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that VXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXFVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

4.19%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

13.89%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

17.20%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

21.56%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

21.02%

+1.25%

VXF vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VXF and VOT have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VXF vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

VXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than VOT's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.62%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.03%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VXF and VOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOT has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to VXF (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXF dropped -58.03% vs VOT's -60.16%.

On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 11.74% vs 11.66% for VOT. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, VXF has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF and VOT have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

VXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.62% for VOT.

VXF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VXF tracks S&P Completion Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index.

VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXF and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer