VXF vs. VOT
VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Completion Index, while VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VXF returned 12.63%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for VOT. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
VXF vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXF achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 10.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VXF having a 12.63% annualized return and VOT not far ahead at 12.73%.
VXF
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 15.53%
- 6M
- 12.62%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
VOT
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 7.76%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
VXF vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 15.53% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 10.04% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXF and VOT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VXF and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VXF vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXF
VOT
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
VXF
VOT
Industrials
VXF
VOT
Financial Services
VXF
VOT
Healthcare
VXF
VOT
Consumer Cyclical
VXF
VOT
Real Estate
VXF
VOT
Energy
VXF
VOT
Basic Materials
VXF
VOT
Communication Services
VXF
VOT
Consumer Defensive
VXF
VOT
Utilities
VXF
VOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXF vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank
VXF
VOT
VXF vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXF | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.14 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.84 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.57 | 2.50 | +8.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXF vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXF drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXF and VOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXF | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.03% | -60.16% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -15.96% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.92% | -21.77% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -37.19% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.72% | -37.19% | -4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | 0.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.54% | -9.94% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 5.35% | -2.45% |
Volatility
VXF vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) is 6.09%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that VXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXF | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 6.71% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 13.56% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.84% | 16.83% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 21.51% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 21.07% | +1.27% |
VXF vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VXF and VOT have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VXF vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
VXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than VOT's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VXF and VOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOT has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to VXF (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXF dropped -58.03% vs VOT's -60.16%.
On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 12.73% vs 12.63% for VXF. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, VXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 12.73% return vs 12.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXF and VOT have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
VXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.60% for VOT.
VXF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VXF tracks S&P Completion Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index.
VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXF and VOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer