VXF vs. VB
VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Completion Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VXF returned 12.63%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for VB. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
VXF vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VXF having a 15.53% return and VB slightly higher at 15.68%. Over the past 10 years, VXF has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 12.63%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 11.79% annualized return.
VXF
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 15.53%
- 6M
- 12.62%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
VB
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 30.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
VXF vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 15.53% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.68% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXF and VB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.98 |
The correlation between VXF and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
VXF vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXF
VB
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
VXF
VB
Industrials
VXF
VB
Financial Services
VXF
VB
Healthcare
VXF
VB
Consumer Cyclical
VXF
VB
Real Estate
VXF
VB
Energy
VXF
VB
Basic Materials
VXF
VB
Communication Services
VXF
VB
Consumer Defensive
VXF
VB
Utilities
VXF
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXF vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
VXF
VB
VXF vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXF | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.38 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.57 | 12.38 | -1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXF vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXF drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXF and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXF | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.03% | -59.56% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -8.98% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.92% | -25.36% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -28.15% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.72% | -42.05% | +0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.39% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.54% | -8.42% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.44% | +0.46% |
Volatility
VXF vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.92%. This indicates that VXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXF | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 4.92% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 12.21% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.84% | 16.66% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 20.78% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 21.45% | +0.89% |
VXF vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VXF and VB have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VXF vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
VXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VB's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VXF and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXF has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to VB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXF dropped -58.03% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.63% vs 11.79% for VB. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.63% return vs 11.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXF and VB have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.01% for VXF.
VXF is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. VXF tracks S&P Completion Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXF and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer