PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXF vs. PWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXF vs. PWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXF achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than PWC's 5.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VXF has outperformed PWC with an annualized return of 12.08%, while PWC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.


VXF

1D
-1.02%
1M
4.75%
YTD
13.78%
6M
12.61%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
12.08%

PWC

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.31%
YTD
5.85%
6M
6.04%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXF vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
13.78%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
5.85%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VXF and PWC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2003

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between VXF and PWC has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VXF vs. PWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VXF
PWC

Technology

19.8%
26.1%

Industrials

19.3%
10.3%

Financial Services

14.6%
14.0%

Healthcare

13.3%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
11.5%

Real Estate

6.0%
5.6%

Energy

5.1%
5.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.3%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
6.8%

Utilities

2.0%
2.7%

Technology

VXF
19.8%
PWC
26.1%

Industrials

VXF
19.3%
PWC
10.3%

Financial Services

VXF
14.6%
PWC
14.0%

Healthcare

VXF
13.3%
PWC
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VXF
9.7%
PWC
11.5%

Real Estate

VXF
6.0%
PWC
5.6%

Energy

VXF
5.1%
PWC
5.5%

Basic Materials

VXF
4.2%
PWC
3.5%

Communication Services

VXF
3.3%
PWC
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

VXF
2.7%
PWC
6.8%

Utilities

VXF
2.0%
PWC
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXF vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PWC
PWC Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXF vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VXFPWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.15

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

1.32

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

4.06

+6.01

VXF vs. PWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the PWC Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXF and PWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VXFPWCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

0.88

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.38

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.51

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.11

+0.34

Drawdowns

VXF vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXF drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXF and PWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXFPWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-78.13%

+20.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-6.45%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.92%

-15.12%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-26.58%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.72%

-39.45%

-2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-2.37%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-36.21%

+26.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.10%

+0.77%

Volatility

VXF vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) at 2.14%. This indicates that VXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXFPWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

2.14%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

7.19%

+5.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

9.75%

+7.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

16.07%

+6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

18.81%

+3.48%

VXF vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXF has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VXF vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison

VXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than PWC's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
1.68%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.02%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


VXF and PWC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXF has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to PWC (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXF dropped -58.03% vs PWC's -78.13%.

On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.08% vs 9.52% for PWC. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.02% for VXF.

VXF tracks S&P Completion Index, while PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXF and 0.60% for PWC.

VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXF and PWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer