PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWC vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWC vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWC achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PWC has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.53%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.


PWC

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
5.98%
6M
6.32%
1Y
8.92%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
9.53%

SPY

1D
0.14%
1M
5.40%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.09%
1Y
29.62%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
15.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWC vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
5.98%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%20.16%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PWC and SPY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2003

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between PWC and SPY has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PWC vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PWC
SPY

Technology

26.1%
35.9%

Financial Services

14.0%
11.8%

Healthcare

12.7%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
10.3%

Industrials

10.3%
7.8%

Communication Services

7.0%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
4.8%

Real Estate

5.6%
1.9%

Energy

5.5%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.5%
1.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Technology

PWC
26.1%
SPY
35.9%

Financial Services

PWC
14.0%
SPY
11.8%

Healthcare

PWC
12.7%
SPY
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PWC
11.5%
SPY
10.3%

Industrials

PWC
10.3%
SPY
7.8%

Communication Services

PWC
7.0%
SPY
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

PWC
6.8%
SPY
4.8%

Real Estate

PWC
5.6%
SPY
1.9%

Energy

PWC
5.5%
SPY
3.6%

Basic Materials

PWC
3.5%
SPY
1.8%

Utilities

PWC
2.7%
SPY
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWC vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWC
PWC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWC vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWCSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

2.52

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

3.42

-2.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.46

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

3.42

-2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.34

15.93

-11.59

PWC vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWC Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWC and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWCSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

2.52

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.84

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.87

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.59

-0.48

Drawdowns

PWC vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWC drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWC and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWCSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.13%

-55.19%

-22.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-8.88%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-18.76%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-24.50%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

-33.72%

-5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

0.00%

-2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.21%

-9.05%

-27.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.91%

+0.19%

Volatility

PWC vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) is 2.31%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that PWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWCSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

2.75%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

8.89%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.74%

11.81%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

17.05%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

17.94%

+0.88%

PWC vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWC vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

PWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than SPY's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
1.68%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.97%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWC and SPY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPY has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to PWC (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWC dropped -78.13% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.57% vs 9.53% for PWC. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 9.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.97% for SPY.

PWC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PWC and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWC and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer