PWC vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Market Intellidex Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWC returned 9.67%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for SCHG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

PWC vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWC achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PWC has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 9.67%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.

PWC

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: 5.50%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 8.55%
• 3Y*: 13.17%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: 9.67%

SCHG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWC vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	5.50%	6.15%	17.46%	19.03%	-16.01%	19.38%	8.52%	13.47%	-6.40%	20.16%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.35%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PWC and SCHG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between PWC and SCHG has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PWC vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PWC	SCHG
Technology	26.1%	46.7%
Financial Services	14.0%	6.6%
Healthcare	12.7%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	12.4%
Industrials	10.3%	6.0%
Communication Services	7.0%	15.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	1.6%
Energy	5.5%	0.7%
Real Estate	5.3%	0.5%
Basic Materials	3.5%	1.3%
Utilities	2.7%	0.4%

Return for Risk

PWC vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWC

PWC Risk / Return Rank: 26
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 23
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 30

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWC vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWC	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.11	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.56	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.20	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	1.10	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.99	3.58	+0.41

PWC vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWC Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWC and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PWC vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWC drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWC and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWC	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.13%	-34.59%	-43.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-16.41%	+9.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	-23.39%	+8.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	-34.59%	+8.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.45%	-34.59%	-4.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.69%	-6.46%	+3.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.13%	-5.20%	-30.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	5.02%	-2.87%

Volatility

PWC vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) is 2.87%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that PWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PWC	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	5.91%	-3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.29%	12.52%	-5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.86%	16.24%	-6.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.03%	22.38%	-6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	21.58%	-2.79%

PWC vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWC vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

PWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	1.80%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWC and SCHG in my portfolio?

PWC and SCHG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PWC or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to PWC (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWC dropped -78.13% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, PWC or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.65% vs 9.67% for PWC. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PWC or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWC or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWC or SCHG?

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between PWC and SCHG?

PWC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PWC and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.