PWC vs. TUSA
PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) and TUSA (First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - PWC tracks the Dynamic Market Intellidex Index while TUSA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWC returned 9.67%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for TUSA. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for TUSA.
Performance
PWC vs. TUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWC achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than TUSA's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, PWC has underperformed TUSA with an annualized return of 9.67%, while TUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.
PWC
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 8.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
TUSA
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
PWC vs. TUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 5.50% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -6.40% | 20.16% |
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 7.13% | 13.64% | 11.12% | 11.75% | -13.54% | 24.79% | 14.16% | 24.29% | -10.35% | 20.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWC and TUSA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2004 | 0.64 |
The correlation between PWC and TUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PWC vs. TUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PWC
TUSA
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
PWC
TUSA
Financial Services
PWC
TUSA
Healthcare
PWC
TUSA
Consumer Cyclical
PWC
TUSA
Industrials
PWC
TUSA
Communication Services
PWC
TUSA
Consumer Defensive
PWC
TUSA
Energy
PWC
TUSA
Real Estate
PWC
TUSA
Basic Materials
PWC
TUSA
Utilities
PWC
TUSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWC vs. TUSA — Risk / Return Rank
PWC
TUSA
PWC vs. TUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWC | TUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.26 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 2.85 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 7.28 | -3.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWC vs. TUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWC drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than TUSA's maximum drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWC and TUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWC | TUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.13% | -56.53% | -21.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.45% | -6.57% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -18.04% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -23.35% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.45% | -42.47% | +3.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -3.94% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -9.85% | -26.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.57% | -0.42% |
Volatility
PWC vs. TUSA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) is 2.87%, while First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that PWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWC | TUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 3.16% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 8.69% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.86% | 13.03% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 17.63% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 20.13% | -1.34% |
PWC vs. TUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TUSA's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWC vs. TUSA - Dividend Comparison
PWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than TUSA's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 1.80% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 1.65% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWC and TUSA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUSA has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to PWC (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWC dropped -78.13% vs TUSA's -56.53%.
On 10-year performance, TUSA leads with 11.06% vs 9.67% for PWC. On fees, PWC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TUSA has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PWC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.
PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.65% for TUSA.
PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index, while TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PWC and 0.70% for TUSA.
TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWC and TUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer