VXF vs. EUSA
VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) and EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - VXF tracks the S&P Completion Index while EUSA tracks the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VXF returned 12.10%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for EUSA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VXF charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for EUSA.
Performance
VXF vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXF achieves a 15.07% return, which is significantly higher than EUSA's 10.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VXF having a 12.10% annualized return and EUSA not far behind at 11.57%.
VXF
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 15.07%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 30.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
EUSA
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 19.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
VXF vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 15.07% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 10.04% | 10.24% | 14.64% | 17.72% | -17.13% | 25.60% | 15.03% | 30.56% | -8.58% | 19.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXF and EUSA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010 | 0.83 |
The correlation between VXF and EUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VXF vs. EUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXF
EUSA
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
VXF
EUSA
Industrials
VXF
EUSA
Financial Services
VXF
EUSA
Healthcare
VXF
EUSA
Consumer Cyclical
VXF
EUSA
Real Estate
VXF
EUSA
Energy
VXF
EUSA
Basic Materials
VXF
EUSA
Communication Services
VXF
EUSA
Consumer Defensive
VXF
EUSA
Utilities
VXF
EUSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXF vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank
VXF
EUSA
VXF vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VXF | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 2.46 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.54 | 9.76 | +0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VXF | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 1.63 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.47 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.63 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.71 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
VXF vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXF drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than EUSA's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXF and EUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXF | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.03% | -39.16% | -18.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -7.82% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.92% | -18.20% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -25.24% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.72% | -39.16% | -2.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -4.59% | -4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 1.97% | +0.90% |
Volatility
VXF vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) at 2.93%. This indicates that VXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXF | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 2.93% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 8.75% | +3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 11.80% | +5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 16.95% | +5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 18.34% | +3.95% |
VXF vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXF has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EUSA's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VXF vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison
VXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than EUSA's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 1.51% | 1.63% | 1.47% | 1.53% | 1.73% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 2.01% | 1.50% | 1.59% | 2.21% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VXF and EUSA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXF has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to EUSA (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXF dropped -58.03% vs EUSA's -39.16%.
On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.10% vs 11.57% for EUSA. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.10% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for EUSA.
EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.01% for VXF.
VXF tracks S&P Completion Index, while EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXF and 0.09% for EUSA.
VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXF and EUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer