PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXF vs. EUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXF vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXF achieves a 15.07% return, which is significantly higher than EUSA's 10.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VXF having a 12.10% annualized return and EUSA not far behind at 11.57%.


VXF

1D
1.13%
1M
4.62%
YTD
15.07%
6M
13.20%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
12.10%

EUSA

1D
0.81%
1M
3.88%
YTD
10.04%
6M
10.00%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
11.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXF vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
15.07%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
10.04%10.24%14.64%17.72%-17.13%25.60%15.03%30.56%-8.58%19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VXF and EUSA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010

0.83

The correlation between VXF and EUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VXF vs. EUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VXF
EUSA

Technology

19.8%
21.3%

Industrials

19.3%
14.7%

Financial Services

14.6%
14.4%

Healthcare

13.3%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
9.7%

Real Estate

6.0%
5.5%

Energy

5.1%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
4.1%

Communication Services

3.3%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
5.2%

Utilities

2.0%
5.6%

Technology

VXF
19.8%
EUSA
21.3%

Industrials

VXF
19.3%
EUSA
14.7%

Financial Services

VXF
14.6%
EUSA
14.4%

Healthcare

VXF
13.3%
EUSA
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VXF
9.7%
EUSA
9.7%

Real Estate

VXF
6.0%
EUSA
5.5%

Energy

VXF
5.1%
EUSA
4.6%

Basic Materials

VXF
4.2%
EUSA
4.1%

Communication Services

VXF
3.3%
EUSA
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

VXF
2.7%
EUSA
5.2%

Utilities

VXF
2.0%
EUSA
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXF vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXF vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VXFEUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.46

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.54

9.76

+0.78

VXF vs. EUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the EUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXF and EUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VXFEUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.63

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.47

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.63

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.71

-0.25

Drawdowns

VXF vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXF drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than EUSA's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXF and EUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXFEUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-39.16%

-18.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-7.82%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.92%

-18.20%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-25.24%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.72%

-39.16%

-2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-4.59%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

1.97%

+0.90%

Volatility

VXF vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) at 2.93%. This indicates that VXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXFEUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

2.93%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

8.75%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

11.80%

+5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

16.95%

+5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

18.34%

+3.95%

VXF vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXF has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than EUSA's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VXF vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison

VXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than EUSA's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.51%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.01%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VXF and EUSA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VXF has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to EUSA (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXF dropped -58.03% vs EUSA's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.10% vs 11.57% for EUSA. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.10% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for EUSA.

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.01% for VXF.

VXF tracks S&P Completion Index, while EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXF and 0.09% for EUSA.

VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXF and EUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer