PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 8.85%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


VWO

1D
-1.41%
1M
2.72%
YTD
12.22%
6M
13.79%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
8.85%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
12.22%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and VUG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005

0.71

The correlation between VWO and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWO vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
VUG

Technology

29.6%
53.5%

Financial Services

19.5%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
12.2%

Industrials

8.0%
3.6%

Basic Materials

8.0%
0.6%

Communication Services

7.1%
17.3%

Energy

4.6%
0.4%

Healthcare

3.9%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
1.5%

Utilities

2.9%
0.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.0%

Technology

VWO
29.6%
VUG
53.5%

Financial Services

VWO
19.5%
VUG
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
10.7%
VUG
12.2%

Industrials

VWO
8.0%
VUG
3.6%

Basic Materials

VWO
8.0%
VUG
0.6%

Communication Services

VWO
7.1%
VUG
17.3%

Energy

VWO
4.6%
VUG
0.4%

Healthcare

VWO
3.9%
VUG
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.7%
VUG
1.5%

Utilities

VWO
2.9%
VUG
0.9%

Real Estate

VWO
2.2%
VUG
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWOVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.69

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

5.92

+4.04

VWO vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWOVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.77

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.68

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.85

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.62

-0.35

Drawdowns

VWO vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-50.68%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-16.53%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-22.85%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.64%

-35.61%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-35.61%

-0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.51%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-7.09%

-8.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

4.71%

-1.62%

Volatility

VWO vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

3.83%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

12.11%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

15.84%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

22.22%

-4.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

21.44%

-2.24%

VWO vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.40%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and VUG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.26% vs 8.85% for VWO. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.03% for VUG.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer