PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 9.00%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.


VWO

1D
0.76%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
10.77%
6M
12.57%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.00%

SCHG

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.96%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
18.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
10.77%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.58%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and SCHG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.68

The correlation between VWO and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWO vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
SCHG

Technology

29.6%
46.7%

Financial Services

19.5%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
12.4%

Industrials

8.0%
6.0%

Basic Materials

8.0%
1.3%

Communication Services

7.1%
15.3%

Energy

4.6%
0.7%

Healthcare

3.9%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
1.6%

Utilities

2.9%
0.4%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.5%

Technology

VWO
29.6%
SCHG
46.7%

Financial Services

VWO
19.5%
SCHG
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
10.7%
SCHG
12.4%

Industrials

VWO
8.0%
SCHG
6.0%

Basic Materials

VWO
8.0%
SCHG
1.3%

Communication Services

VWO
7.1%
SCHG
15.3%

Energy

VWO
4.6%
SCHG
0.7%

Healthcare

VWO
3.9%
SCHG
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.7%
SCHG
1.6%

Utilities

VWO
2.9%
SCHG
0.4%

Real Estate

VWO
2.2%
SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

1.14

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

3.78

+4.03

VWO vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-34.59%

-33.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-16.41%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-23.39%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-34.59%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-34.59%

-1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-5.33%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-5.20%

-10.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

4.96%

-1.79%

Volatility

VWO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.14%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

5.14%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.04%

12.30%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

15.95%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

22.33%

-4.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

21.58%

-2.36%

VWO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.44%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and SCHG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 9.00% for VWO. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.04% for SCHG.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer