PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. BAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 3.72% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 9.00%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.19% annualized return.


VWO

1D
0.76%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
10.77%
6M
12.57%
1Y
24.61%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.00%

BAC

1D
2.31%
1M
13.82%
YTD
3.72%
6M
3.46%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
27.43%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
18.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
10.77%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
3.72%28.04%33.85%4.83%-23.82%49.61%-11.63%46.19%-15.00%35.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and BAC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.48

The correlation between VWO and BAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BAC
BAC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOBACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

1.64

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

4.21

+3.59

VWO vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and BAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and BAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOBACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-93.10%

+25.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-17.93%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-27.51%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-46.64%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-48.95%

+12.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-0.36%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-28.30%

+12.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

6.96%

-3.79%

Volatility

VWO vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.49%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOBACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

5.49%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.04%

16.57%

-2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

21.62%

-5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

26.89%

-9.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

30.68%

-11.46%

Dividends

VWO vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than BAC's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.72%1.96%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.44%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and BAC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to BAC (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs BAC's -93.10%.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and BAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer