VV vs. PFM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - VV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Index while PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VV returned 15.58%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for PFM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.

Performance

VV vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than PFM's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VV has outperformed PFM with an annualized return of 15.58%, while PFM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.82% annualized return.

VV

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 10.69%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 27.77%
• 3Y*: 22.68%
• 5Y*: 13.54%
• 10Y*: 15.58%

PFM

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VV vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	10.69%	18.11%	25.25%	27.18%	-19.91%	27.41%	21.04%	31.25%	-4.46%	22.00%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	8.18%	14.00%	16.87%	11.40%	-6.22%	23.08%	9.53%	26.88%	-4.58%	17.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and PFM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2005	0.90

The correlation between VV and PFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VV vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VV	PFM
Technology	35.9%	24.7%
Financial Services	11.8%	18.5%
Communication Services	11.2%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	4.0%
Healthcare	8.6%	14.9%
Industrials	8.0%	11.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	12.0%
Energy	3.6%	4.7%
Utilities	2.7%	4.2%
Real Estate	1.7%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.6%	3.0%

Return for Risk

VV vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV

VV Risk / Return Rank: 67
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 68
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 62
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VV	PFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.09	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.07	+0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.38	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	2.78	+0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.86	11.28	+2.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VV vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VV	PFM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.09	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.79	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.78	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.53	+0.07

Drawdowns

VV vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, roughly equal to the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and PFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VV	PFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.81%	-53.21%	-1.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-7.09%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.97%	-14.50%	-4.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	-17.81%	-7.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.28%	-32.22%	-2.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-0.23%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.84%	-6.94%	+0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.75%	+0.26%

Volatility

VV vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that VV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VV	PFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	2.04%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.98%	7.13%	+1.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.99%	9.47%	+2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	13.54%	+3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.19%	15.21%	+2.98%

VV vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

VV vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than PFM's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.33%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	0.98%	1.08%	1.24%	1.41%	1.66%	1.19%	1.46%	1.81%	2.09%	1.75%	1.98%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VV and PFM in my portfolio?

VV and PFM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VV or PFM?

VV has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs PFM's -53.21%.

Which ETF is better, VV or PFM?

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.58% vs 11.82% for PFM. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VV or PFM?

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VV or PFM?

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VV or PFM?

PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.98% for VV.

What is the main difference between VV and PFM?

VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.53% for PFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.