VUG vs. VBILX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and VBILX (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares) are both funds - VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while VBILX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUG returned 17.90%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for VBILX. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VBILX.

Performance

VUG vs. VBILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly higher than VBILX's -0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has outperformed VBILX with an annualized return of 17.90%, while VBILX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.85% annualized return.

VUG

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -3.64%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 22.83%
• 3Y*: 23.38%
• 5Y*: 13.78%
• 10Y*: 17.90%

VBILX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: -0.14%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 4.66%
• 3Y*: 4.44%
• 5Y*: 0.07%
• 10Y*: 1.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. VBILX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	4.99%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	27.72%
VBILX Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares	-0.14%	8.57%	1.54%	6.09%	-13.59%	-2.36%	9.82%	10.20%	-0.15%	3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and VBILX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	-0.16

The correlation between VUG and VBILX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VUG vs. VBILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 36
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

VBILX

VBILX Risk / Return Rank: 24
VBILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
VBILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
VBILX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
VBILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
VBILX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. VBILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VUG	VBILX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.14	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	1.73	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.20	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	1.37	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.43	3.93	+0.49

VUG vs. VBILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the VBILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and VBILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VUG vs. VBILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than VBILX's maximum drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and VBILX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUG	VBILX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.68%	-19.26%	-31.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.53%	-3.43%	-13.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	-6.05%	-16.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.61%	-19.15%	-16.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.61%	-19.26%	-16.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.56%	-1.93%	-3.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-3.16%	-3.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	1.19%	+3.60%

Volatility

VUG vs. VBILX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX) at 1.49%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUG	VBILX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	1.49%	+4.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	3.07%	+9.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.46%	4.12%	+12.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.30%	6.39%	+15.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.48%	5.37%	+16.11%

VUG vs. VBILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VBILX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VUG vs. VBILX - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than VBILX's 4.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VBILX Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares	4.22%	4.01%	3.80%	3.09%	1.99%	3.39%	2.94%	2.73%	2.87%	2.73%	3.06%	3.09%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.39%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUG and VBILX in my portfolio?

VUG and VBILX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VUG or VBILX?

VUG has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to VBILX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs VBILX's -19.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.