PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBILX vs. VBTLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBILX vs. VBTLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBILX achieves a -1.04% return, which is significantly lower than VBTLX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, VBILX has outperformed VBTLX with an annualized return of 1.62%, while VBTLX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.30% annualized return.


VBILX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.06%
6M
-1.02%
YTD
-1.04%
1Y
1.34%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
1.62%
ALL TIME*
3.91%

VBTLX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.93%
YTD
-0.70%
1Y
1.67%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
-0.45%
10Y*
1.30%
ALL TIME*
3.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VBILX vs. VBTLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBILX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
-1.04%8.57%1.54%6.09%-13.59%-2.36%9.82%10.20%-0.15%3.86%
VBTLX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
-0.70%7.17%1.26%5.74%-13.16%-1.81%7.72%8.73%-0.25%3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between VBILX and VBTLX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2001

0.95

The correlation between VBILX and VBTLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBILX vs. VBTLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VBILX
VBILX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VBILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBILX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VBILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBILX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VBTLX
VBTLX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VBTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VBTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VBILX vs. VBTLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBILXVBTLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

0.99

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.88

2.48

-0.60

VBILX vs. VBTLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBILX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the VBTLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBILX and VBTLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBILX vs. VBTLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBILX drawdown since its inception was -19.26%, roughly equal to the maximum VBTLX drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBILX and VBTLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBILXVBTLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-18.81%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-2.89%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.20%

-4.86%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.15%

-18.14%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.26%

-18.81%

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-3.27%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-2.67%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

1.15%

+0.28%

Volatility

VBILX vs. VBTLX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX) at 0.96%. This indicates that VBILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBTLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBILXVBTLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

0.96%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.24%

2.97%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

3.82%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

6.01%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

4.98%

+0.38%

VBILX vs. VBTLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBILX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VBTLX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBILX vs. VBTLX - Dividend Comparison

VBILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than VBTLX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBILX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.94%4.01%3.80%3.09%1.99%3.39%2.94%2.73%2.87%2.73%3.06%3.09%
VBTLX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.72%3.87%3.69%3.10%2.59%1.96%2.39%2.74%2.57%2.56%2.53%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VBILX and VBTLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBILX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to VBTLX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBILX dropped -19.26% vs VBTLX's -18.81%.

VBTLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBILX and VBTLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer