VUG vs. QUS
VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUG returned 17.81%/yr vs 13.57%/yr for QUS. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
VUG vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 6.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has outperformed QUS with an annualized return of 17.81%, while QUS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.57% annualized return.
VUG
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.81%
QUS
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- 1Y
- 17.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
VUG vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 5.80% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 6.19% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -3.66% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUG and QUS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between VUG and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VUG vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUG
QUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
VUG
QUS
Communication Services
VUG
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
VUG
QUS
Healthcare
VUG
QUS
Financial Services
VUG
QUS
Industrials
VUG
QUS
Consumer Defensive
VUG
QUS
Real Estate
VUG
QUS
Utilities
VUG
QUS
Basic Materials
VUG
QUS
Energy
VUG
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUG vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
VUG
QUS
VUG vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.34 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 2.56 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 11.39 | -6.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.90 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.77 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.77 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
VUG vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -33.78% | -16.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -6.85% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -13.94% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -22.30% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -33.78% | -1.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -1.27% | -3.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -3.70% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 1.54% | +3.18% |
Volatility
VUG vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.31%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUG | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 2.31% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.68% | 6.82% | +5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.26% | 9.21% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 14.33% | +7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 16.43% | +5.04% |
VUG vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUG vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than QUS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.32% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUG and QUS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to QUS (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.81% vs 13.57% for QUS. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.81% return vs 13.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VUG and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer