PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUG vs. MRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUG vs. MRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly higher than MRSH's -9.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has outperformed MRSH with an annualized return of 18.30%, while MRSH has yielded a comparatively lower 11.56% annualized return.


VUG

1D
2.81%
1M
0.27%
YTD
7.94%
6M
9.17%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
18.30%

MRSH

1D
-1.48%
1M
3.19%
YTD
-9.50%
6M
-10.36%
1Y
-22.08%
3Y*
-1.27%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. MRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
7.94%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc
-9.50%-11.26%13.75%16.15%-3.45%50.83%6.86%42.33%-0.14%22.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and MRSH is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.53

The correlation between VUG and MRSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUG vs. MRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MRSH
MRSH Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. MRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUGMRSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.84

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

-0.82

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.50

-1.42

+6.92

VUG vs. MRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the MRSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and MRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUG vs. MRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, smaller than the maximum MRSH drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and MRSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUGMRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.68%

-67.46%

+16.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-27.01%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-34.36%

+11.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

-34.36%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-35.80%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-30.66%

+27.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-17.41%

+10.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

15.56%

-10.77%

Volatility

VUG vs. MRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) is 6.32%, while Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that VUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUGMRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

7.13%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

19.09%

-5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

23.52%

-6.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

20.21%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

20.95%

+0.56%

Dividends

VUG vs. MRSH - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than MRSH's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc
2.17%1.85%1.44%1.37%1.36%1.15%1.57%1.56%1.98%1.76%1.92%2.13%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.38%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUG and MRSH have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRSH has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to VUG (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs MRSH's -67.46%.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUG and MRSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer