MRSH vs. VOO
MRSH (Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, MRSH returned 12.43%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for VOO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MRSH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRSH achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MRSH has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.43%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.15% annualized return.
MRSH
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- 9.22%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- -12.43%
- 3Y*
- 0.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 21.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.15%
MRSH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | -0.81% | -11.26% | 13.75% | 16.15% | -3.45% | 50.83% | 6.86% | 42.33% | -0.14% | 22.73% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.72% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRSH and VOO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.59 |
The correlation between MRSH and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRSH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
MRSH
VOO
MRSH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRSH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.32 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 2.45 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 10.68 | -11.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRSH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRSH drawdown since its inception was -67.46%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSH and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRSH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.46% | -33.99% | -33.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.47% | -8.90% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.36% | -18.69% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.36% | -24.52% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.80% | -33.99% | -1.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.00% | -0.88% | -23.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.43% | -3.67% | -13.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.05% | 2.04% | +12.01% |
Volatility
MRSH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.48%. This indicates that MRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRSH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 3.48% | +5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.69% | 9.98% | +10.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.97% | 12.52% | +12.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 16.92% | +3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 17.99% | +3.05% |
Dividends
MRSH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
MRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than VOO's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | 1.98% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRSH and VOO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRSH has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to VOO (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRSH dropped -67.46% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRSH and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer