MRSH vs. CTAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
Performance
MRSH vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MRSH vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | -6.03% | -11.26% | 13.75% | 16.15% | -3.45% | 50.83% | 6.86% | 42.33% | -0.14% | 22.73% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | -9.86% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 34.82% | 2.97% | 26.51% | 32.74% | 61.73% | 9.04% | 36.32% |
Fundamentals
MRSH:
$84.99B
CTAS:
$68.81B
MRSH:
$8.44
CTAS:
$4.75
MRSH:
20.56
CTAS:
35.63
MRSH:
2.40
CTAS:
2.50
MRSH:
3.17
CTAS:
6.26
MRSH:
5.55
CTAS:
14.37
MRSH:
$26.98B
CTAS:
$11.03B
MRSH:
$8.75B
CTAS:
$1.33B
MRSH:
$7.03B
CTAS:
$2.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRSH achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly higher than CTAS's -9.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MRSH has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 12.83%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.61% annualized return.
MRSH
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -7.12%
- YTD
- -6.03%
- 6M
- -13.11%
- 1Y
- -27.69%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
CTAS
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -15.91%
- YTD
- -9.86%
- 6M
- -17.21%
- 1Y
- -17.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 23.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRSH vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank
MRSH
CTAS
MRSH vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRSH | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | -0.80 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | -1.02 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.87 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -0.60 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | -1.31 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRSH | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.17 | -0.80 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.68 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.89 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between MRSH and CTAS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MRSH vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
MRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than CTAS's 1.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | 2.03% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 1.03% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
Drawdowns
MRSH vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRSH drawdown since its inception was -67.46%, roughly equal to the maximum CTAS drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRSH and CTAS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRSH | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.46% | -65.32% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.78% | -26.72% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.78% | -26.72% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.80% | -48.38% | +12.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.00% | -25.20% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.34% | -14.99% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.30% | 12.22% | +7.08% |
Volatility
MRSH vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) is 7.45%, while Cintas Corporation (CTAS) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that MRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MRSH | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 7.96% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.49% | 14.35% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.67% | 21.38% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 22.49% | -2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 26.52% | -5.89% |
Financials
MRSH vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MRSH vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison
MRSH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.
MRSH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 6.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.5%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
MRSH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported a net income of 821.00M and revenue of 6.60B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.