VUG vs. MFUS
VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUG returned 14.33%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for MFUS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
VUG vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 14.06% return.
VUG
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.81%
MFUS
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 14.06%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 5.80% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 7.49% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 14.06% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.30% | 11.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUG and MFUS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.74 |
The correlation between VUG and MFUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VUG vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUG
MFUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
VUG
MFUS
Communication Services
VUG
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
VUG
MFUS
Healthcare
VUG
MFUS
Financial Services
VUG
MFUS
Industrials
VUG
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
VUG
MFUS
Real Estate
VUG
MFUS
Utilities
VUG
MFUS
Basic Materials
VUG
MFUS
Energy
VUG
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUG vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
VUG
MFUS
VUG vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.44 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 4.16 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 17.05 | -11.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.43 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.82 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.77 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
VUG vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -35.21% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -6.39% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -15.39% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -18.22% | -17.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -2.17% | -2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -3.99% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 1.56% | +3.16% |
Volatility
VUG vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.71%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 3.71% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.68% | 8.52% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.26% | 10.94% | +5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 15.06% | +7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 17.36% | +4.11% |
VUG vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUG vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than MFUS's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUG and MFUS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to MFUS (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 14.33% vs 12.37% for MFUS. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VUG and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer