VUG vs. ICOP

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while ICOP is a Copper fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VUG returned 26.29% vs 98.32% for ICOP. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ICOP.

Performance

VUG vs. ICOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than ICOP's 27.00% return.

VUG

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 24.04%
• 5Y*: 14.43%
• 10Y*: 18.30%

ICOP

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: 8.46%
• YTD: 27.00%
• 6M: 33.16%
• 1Y: 98.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. ICOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	7.94%	19.40%	32.69%	11.87%
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	27.00%	78.01%	1.10%	8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and ICOP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023	0.43

The correlation between VUG and ICOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUG vs. ICOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VUG	ICOP
Technology	53.5%	-
Communication Services	17.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	-
Healthcare	4.6%	-
Financial Services	4.3%	-
Industrials	3.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Utilities	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	100.0%
Energy	0.4%	-

Return for Risk

VUG vs. ICOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 44
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 38

ICOP

ICOP Risk / Return Rank: 77
ICOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ICOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ICOP Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ICOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ICOP Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. ICOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VUG	ICOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.52	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.86	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.39	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	3.78	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.50	13.47	-7.97

VUG vs. ICOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the ICOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and ICOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VUG vs. ICOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than ICOP's maximum drawdown of -38.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and ICOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUG	ICOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.68%	-38.67%	-12.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.53%	-26.13%	+9.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	-3.51%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-11.63%	+4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	7.33%	-2.54%

Volatility

VUG vs. ICOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) is 6.32%, while iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has a volatility of 17.02%. This indicates that VUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUG	ICOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.32%	17.02%	-10.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.28%	34.42%	-21.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.65%	39.31%	-22.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.34%	34.34%	-12.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.51%	34.34%	-12.83%

VUG vs. ICOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOP's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUG vs. ICOP - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than ICOP's 2.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	2.13%	2.08%	1.87%	2.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.38%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUG and ICOP in my portfolio?

VUG and ICOP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VUG or ICOP?

ICOP has higher volatility (17.02%) compared to VUG (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs ICOP's -38.67%.

Which ETF is better, VUG or ICOP?

On 1-year performance, ICOP leads with 98.32% vs 26.29% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VUG or ICOP?

Over the 1-year period, ICOP has performed better with a 98.32% return vs 26.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUG or ICOP?

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ICOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VUG or ICOP?

ICOP has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.38% for VUG.

What is the main difference between VUG and ICOP?

VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ICOP is Copper. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while ICOP tracks STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.47% for ICOP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.