PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICOP vs. NIKL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ICOP vs. NIKL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ICOP vs. NIKL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ICOP
Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF
10.79%78.01%1.10%8.08%
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
4.61%52.05%-22.48%-20.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOP achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly higher than NIKL's 4.61% return.


ICOP

1D
3.18%
1M
-13.28%
YTD
10.79%
6M
31.79%
1Y
90.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NIKL

1D
2.78%
1M
-15.83%
YTD
4.61%
6M
12.89%
1Y
90.01%
3Y*
-1.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ICOP vs. NIKL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOP has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than NIKL's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ICOP vs. NIKL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOP
ICOP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ICOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOP Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NIKL
NIKL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NIKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIKL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NIKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIKL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOP vs. NIKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICOPNIKLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.38

2.19

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.72

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.34

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

3.03

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.86

9.50

+5.35

ICOP vs. NIKL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the NIKL Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOP and NIKL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICOPNIKLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.19

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.01

+0.96

Correlation

The correlation between ICOP and NIKL is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ICOP vs. NIKL - Dividend Comparison

ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than NIKL's 2.42% yield.


TTM202520242023
ICOP
Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF
1.88%2.08%1.87%2.15%
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
2.42%2.53%3.49%19.52%

Drawdowns

ICOP vs. NIKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOP drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, smaller than the maximum NIKL drawdown of -60.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOP and NIKL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ICOPNIKLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.67%

-60.23%

+21.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.13%

-29.33%

+3.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.33%

-20.08%

+5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-27.00%

+15.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.35%

9.35%

-3.00%

Volatility

ICOP vs. NIKL - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) have volatilities of 16.45% and 16.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ICOPNIKLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.45%

16.87%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.29%

33.15%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.46%

41.35%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.13%

31.74%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.13%

31.74%

+1.39%