ICOP vs. PICK
Compare and contrast key facts about Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK).
ICOP and PICK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICOP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 21, 2023. PICK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both ICOP and PICK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICOP or PICK.
Performance
ICOP vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICOP achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than PICK's -7.98% return.
ICOP
10.58%
-8.64%
-19.80%
26.33%
N/A
N/A
PICK
-7.98%
-5.62%
-14.07%
0.56%
12.09%
5.93%
Key characteristics
| ICOP | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.89 | 0.10 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.39 | 0.29 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.04 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.10 | 0.10 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.35 | 0.24 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.88% | 9.33% |
| Daily Std Dev | 31.34% | 22.33% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.40% | -68.88% |
| Current Drawdown | -19.80% | -16.33% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICOP vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOP has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between ICOP and PICK is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICOP vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICOP vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than PICK's 3.90% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOP Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF | 2.13% | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 3.90% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% | 2.88% | 3.39% |
Drawdowns
ICOP vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOP drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOP and PICK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICOP vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 7.64%. This indicates that ICOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.