VUG vs. FBCGX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and FBCGX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. VUG is passively managed, while FBCGX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUG returned 14.33%/yr vs 16.83%/yr for FBCGX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FBCGX.

Performance

VUG vs. FBCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than FBCGX's 17.54% return.

VUG

• 1D: -3.62%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 24.49%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: 17.81%

FBCGX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 5.56%
• YTD: 17.54%
• 6M: 17.77%
• 1Y: 42.62%
• 3Y*: 32.28%
• 5Y*: 16.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. FBCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	5.80%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	11.03%
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	17.54%	21.33%	38.15%	55.57%	-37.84%	23.00%	62.92%	36.11%	-2.33%	14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and FBCGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017	0.96

The correlation between VUG and FBCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VUG vs. FBCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 38
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

FBCGX

FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. FBCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VUG	FBCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.39	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	3.12	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.41	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	3.33	-1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.09	13.93	-8.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VUG vs. FBCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the FBCGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and FBCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VUG	FBCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	2.39	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.68	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.87	-0.26

Drawdowns

VUG vs. FBCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than FBCGX's maximum drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and FBCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUG	FBCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.68%	-42.55%	-8.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.53%	-12.64%	-3.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.85%	-26.83%	+3.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.61%	-42.55%	+6.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	-0.04%	-4.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-8.89%	+1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	3.01%	+1.71%

Volatility

VUG vs. FBCGX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) at 4.13%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VUG	FBCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	4.13%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	13.12%	-0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.26%	17.64%	-1.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.27%	24.96%	-2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.47%	24.86%	-3.39%

VUG vs. FBCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCGX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUG vs. FBCGX - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than FBCGX's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	0.82%	0.97%	0.62%	0.26%	0.12%	6.71%	1.26%	0.28%	0.46%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.39%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUG and FBCGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, VUG and FBCGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VUG or FBCGX?

VUG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to FBCGX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs FBCGX's -42.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.