FBCGX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
FBCGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
FBCGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBCGX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund | -6.85% | 21.33% | 38.15% | 55.57% | -37.84% | 23.00% | 62.92% | 36.11% | -2.33% | 14.15% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 12.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBCGX achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return.
FBCGX
- 1D
- 4.62%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 6M
- -4.17%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBCGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBCGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBCGX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FBCGX
SCHG
FBCGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBCGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.76 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 1.24 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.09 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 3.71 | +3.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBCGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.76 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.57 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.79 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBCGX and SCHG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FBCGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund | 1.04% | 0.97% | 0.62% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 6.71% | 1.26% | 0.28% | 0.46% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
FBCGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBCGX drawdown since its inception was -42.55%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCGX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBCGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.55% | -34.59% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.28% | -16.41% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.55% | -34.59% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.61% | -12.51% | +3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.04% | -5.22% | -3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 4.84% | -1.37% |
Volatility
FBCGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that FBCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBCGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 6.77% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 12.54% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.02% | 22.45% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 22.31% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.00% | 21.51% | +3.49% |