FBCGX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FBCGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FBCGX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBCGX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund | -6.85% | 21.33% | 38.15% | 55.57% | -37.84% | 23.00% | 62.92% | 36.11% | -2.33% | 14.15% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 12.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBCGX achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -3.66% return.
FBCGX
- 1D
- 4.62%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 6M
- -4.17%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBCGX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBCGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBCGX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FBCGX
VOO
FBCGX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBCGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.01 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 1.53 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.55 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 7.31 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBCGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.01 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.71 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.83 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBCGX and VOO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FBCGX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund | 1.04% | 0.97% | 0.62% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 6.71% | 1.26% | 0.28% | 0.46% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FBCGX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBCGX drawdown since its inception was -42.55%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCGX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBCGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.55% | -33.99% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.28% | -11.98% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.55% | -24.52% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.61% | -5.55% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.04% | -3.72% | -5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 2.55% | +0.92% |
Volatility
FBCGX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that FBCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBCGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 5.34% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 9.47% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.02% | 18.11% | +6.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 16.82% | +8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.00% | 17.99% | +7.01% |