VTWV vs. VT
VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWV returned 10.34%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for VT. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTWV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
VTWV vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 10.34%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
VTWV
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
VT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 12.66%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
VTWV vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 18.98% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.66% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and VT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.76 |
The correlation between VTWV and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWV vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWV
VT
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
VTWV
VT
Industrials
VTWV
VT
Real Estate
VTWV
VT
Healthcare
VTWV
VT
Technology
VTWV
VT
Consumer Cyclical
VTWV
VT
Energy
VTWV
VT
Basic Materials
VTWV
VT
Utilities
VTWV
VT
Communication Services
VTWV
VT
Consumer Defensive
VTWV
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
VT
VTWV vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 3.05 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | 13.61 | +3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.33 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.69 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.74 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.44 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -50.27% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -9.67% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -16.51% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | -26.38% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | -34.24% | -11.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.51% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -7.02% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.17% | +0.36% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.74%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 3.74% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 10.17% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 12.70% | +5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 16.04% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 17.23% | +6.31% |
VTWV vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWV vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWV and VT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to VT (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.72% vs 10.34% for VTWV. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.56% for VTWV.
VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VT is Global Equities. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.06% for VT.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWV and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer