PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWO vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWO vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWO has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.12%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.


VTWO

1D
1.53%
1M
3.33%
YTD
18.87%
6M
16.64%
1Y
41.90%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
11.12%

VTI

1D
0.47%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWO vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
18.87%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.72%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWO and VTI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.88

The correlation between VTWO and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWO vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWO
VTI

Industrials

17.7%
9.8%

Technology

17.0%
33.5%

Healthcare

16.5%
9.2%

Financial Services

15.7%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.0%

Real Estate

6.1%
2.4%

Energy

6.1%
3.7%

Basic Materials

4.8%
2.0%

Utilities

2.9%
2.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.7%

Industrials

VTWO
17.7%
VTI
9.8%

Technology

VTWO
17.0%
VTI
33.5%

Healthcare

VTWO
16.5%
VTI
9.2%

Financial Services

VTWO
15.7%
VTI
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWO
8.4%
VTI
10.0%

Real Estate

VTWO
6.1%
VTI
2.4%

Energy

VTWO
6.1%
VTI
3.7%

Basic Materials

VTWO
4.8%
VTI
2.0%

Utilities

VTWO
2.9%
VTI
2.3%

Communication Services

VTWO
2.4%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

VTWO
2.4%
VTI
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWO vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWO vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWOVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

3.24

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.62

14.94

-1.32

VTWO vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWO and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWOVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.38

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.74

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.82

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.51

+0.02

Drawdowns

VTWO vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWOVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.19%

-55.45%

+14.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-8.92%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-19.30%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-25.36%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

-35.00%

-6.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-8.03%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

1.93%

+1.15%

Volatility

VTWO vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.90%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWOVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

2.90%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

9.13%

+4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.12%

12.17%

+6.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.49%

17.40%

+5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

18.30%

+4.78%

VTWO vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWO vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.07%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWO and VTI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWO has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to VTI (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.04% vs 11.12% for VTWO. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VTWO.

VTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

VTWO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWO and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWO and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer