VTWO vs. VT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWO returned 11.07%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

VTWO vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWO has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 11.07%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.

VTWO

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 17.08%
• 6M: 15.89%
• 1Y: 39.34%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 6.28%
• 10Y*: 11.07%

VT

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 29.24%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWO vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF	17.08%	12.90%	11.55%	17.08%	-20.49%	14.79%	20.22%	25.81%	-11.15%	14.69%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.24%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWO and VT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010	0.84

The correlation between VTWO and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWO vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VTWO	VT
Industrials	17.7%	12.0%
Technology	17.0%	27.8%
Healthcare	16.5%	8.1%
Financial Services	15.7%	15.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	9.5%
Real Estate	6.1%	2.4%
Energy	6.1%	4.3%
Basic Materials	4.8%	4.2%
Utilities	2.9%	2.7%
Communication Services	2.4%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	4.8%

Return for Risk

VTWO vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWO

VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 62
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 54
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWO vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VTWO	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.31	-0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	3.20	-0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.42	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	3.04	+0.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.79	13.53	-0.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTWO vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWO and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTWO	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	2.31	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.69	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.74	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.44	+0.09

Drawdowns

VTWO vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTWO	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.19%	-50.27%	+9.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.99%	-9.67%	-1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.57%	-16.51%	-11.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.88%	-26.38%	-5.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.19%	-34.24%	-6.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.50%	-0.88%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.39%	-7.02%	-1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	2.17%	+0.91%

Volatility

VTWO vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTWO	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	3.83%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.50%	10.17%	+3.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.12%	12.70%	+6.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.48%	16.05%	+6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.08%	17.23%	+5.85%

VTWO vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VTWO vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF	1.08%	1.25%	1.21%	1.45%	1.48%	1.13%	0.92%	1.36%	1.41%	1.18%	1.27%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTWO and VT in my portfolio?

VTWO and VT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VTWO or VT?

VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, VTWO or VT?

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs 11.07% for VTWO. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VTWO or VT?

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VTWO or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VTWO or VT?

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.08% for VTWO.

What is the main difference between VTWO and VT?

VTWO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VT is Global Equities. VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWO and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.